Media Coverage and the Stock Market

How do the sentiment and volume of media correlate with short-term movements in specific stock markets? In today’s world, everyone is connected through fast-moving media. It is important to consider how this has impacted larger trends, such as economics and the stock market.

Our Pivot

We originally used index funds like QQQ to explore whether media coverage had an influence on market behavior. However, after conducting further research and analyzing our initial results, we decided to pivot our focus to a specific stock. Index funds represent the overall health of the economy by tracking a broad range of companies, which makes them less susceptible to short-term media influence. In contrast, individual stocks, especially high-profile ones, can be more directly impacted by media discourse. We chose Tesla as our subject because it consistently generates significant media attention and public conversation. This makes us curious to investigate whether media narratives correlate with fluctuations in Tesla’s stock price, and to what extent sentiment and coverage might drive market movement.

Purpose

Media and Market Relationships

Investigate how fluctuations in media sentiment and volume from platforms like Twitter, Reddit, and news outlets predict short-term stock market movements, using Tesla stonks.

Compare Media Impact

Compare the impact of different media platforms (e.g., Twitter, Reddit, News) on market activity and assess varying influence strengths and patterns.

Analyze Influential Figures

Analyze the influence of high-profile figures' tweets (e.g., Elon Musk, Donald Trump) on investor behavior and short-term price changes, with an academic focus on educating through interactive visualizations.

Assumptions

Media Correlates with Market Behavior

Media sentiment and volume, particularly from high-engagement sources, are assumed to correlate with short-term stock price and volatility changes, influencing investor behavior.

High-Engagement Posts Drive Market Movements

High-engagement posts (e.g., upvotes, impressions) and influential figures (e.g., Elon Musk, Trump) are assumed to have a stronger impact on market movements due to their reach and public profiles.

Machine Learning is Accurate

Machine learning tools, like sentiment analysis and sector classification, are assumed to accurately quantify media coverage and its correlation with sector-specific market activity.

Core Data Assertions

1. Negative sentiment in media consistently aligns with short-term stock price declines

The Extreme Sentiment Days Analysis chart shows that when Reddit sentiment was extremely negative, Tesla’s stock often dropped significantly the next day. In contrast, positive sentiment days were followed by a mix of neutral or positive. This makes it clear that very negative Reddit activity is more likely to lead to sharp price changes, especially in a downward direction. This also reflects the dynamics discussed in the "Reddit Revolt" article about GameStop in The Journal of Finance, where highly charged and coordinated sentiment on r/wallstreetbets directly influenced large institutional market reactions. It reinforces that extreme sentiment on Reddit can indeed drive tangible price movements, especially when driven by collective behavior.

Sentiment Components Analysis   ➔

Tetlock, Paul C. “Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 62, no. 3, 2007, pp. 1139–1168. Columbia Business School

2. Extreme sentiment on Reddit, especially when highly negative, is followed by sharp market reactions

Using the Sentiment Strength vs. Price Volatility charts, we can see how there’s somewhat of a link between strong emotional sentiment and how much Tesla’s stock price moved during the day, but overall, there wasn’t a strong or consistent partner. This means emotional media might increase volatility sometimes, but it doesn’t guarantee a big price swing. This aligns with research by Wan et al., which identifies correlations between sentiment shifts and stock volatility across large datasets of news. Their findings similarly caution that while sentiment contributes to volatility, the relationship is complex and inconsistent across time, suggesting the need for more nuanced models of media influence.

Extreme Sentiment Days Analysis   ➔

Smith, Annabel. “The Reddit Revolt: GameStop and the Impact of Social Media on Institutional Investors.” The TRADE, 2021

3. Higher sentiment intensity and post volume contribute to market volatility, but not always predictably

Using the Sentiment Strength vs. Price Volatility charts, we can see how there’s somewhat of a link between strong emotional sentiment and how much Tesla’s stock price moved during the day, but overall, there wasn’t a strong or consistent partner. This means emotional media might increase volatility sometimes but it doesn’t guarantee a big price swing.

Sentiment Strength vs. Price Volatility   ➔

Wan, Xingchen, et al. “Sentiment Correlation in Financial News Networks and Associated Market Movements.” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, 2021, article no. 2357. Nature

4. Trading volume often spikes alongside Reddit activity, but not Musk tweets

Our comparison between Reddit comment volume and tweet frequency versus trading volume reveals a stronger relationship between Reddit engagement and trading spikes. Musk’s tweets, while emotionally charged, don’t consistently trigger volume changes, suggesting Reddit’s collective activity may have a more tangible effect on market behavior. Research by the University of Warwick found that higher volumes of financial news coverage correlate with increased investor trading activity. Their study supports the idea that sheer quantity of media engagement, such as Reddit comment volume, can help explain spikes in trading volume even without a direct sentiment effect.

Trading Volume vs Social Activity Chart   ➔

Alanyali, Merve, Helen Susannah Moat, and Tobias Preis. “Quantifying the Relationship Between Financial News and the Stock Market.” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, 2013, article no. 3578. Nature